Factors Affecting Teachers Job Satisfaction
Abstract
Teachers in Pakistan and across the world are generally not satisfied with their jobs. This leads towards high turnover and adverse performance. This study has measured the effects of work goals, self-efficacy, positive effect, working conditions, and goal support on teacher’s job satisfaction. The scope of the study was restricted to the school teachers of Karachi. A selfadministered questionnaire from the literature was adapted for the study. The developed model was tested through SEM. Prior to estimating the hypothesized model, the normality, reliability, and validity of the constructs on the present data set was checked. The results suggest that selfefficacy has a strong effect on job satisfaction followed by positive effect and working conditions.Keywords: Job satisfaction, work goals, self-efficacy, goal support, positive effect, working conditions.References
Abbas, M., Raja, U., Darr, W., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2014). Combined effects of perceived politics
and psychological capital on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance.
Journal of Management, 40(7), 1813-1830.
Akram, M., Malik, M. I., Sarwar, M., Anwer, M., & Ahmad, F. (2015). Relationship of teacher
competence with professional commitment and job satisfaction at secondary level.
International Journal of AYER, 4, 58-70.
Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Teachers’ views of their school climate and its relationship
with teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Learning Environments Research, 19(2),
-307.
Amin, M., Shah, S., & Tatlah, I. A. (2013). Impact of Principals/Directors’ Leadership Styles on
Job Satisfaction of the Faculty Members: Perceptions of the Faculty Members in a Public
University of Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Research & Reflections in Education, 7(2), 97-112.
Aydin, A., Sarier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The Effect of School Principals’ Leadership Styles on
Teachers’ Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction. Educational sciences: Theory
and practice, 13(2), 806-811.
Babin, B. J., Boles, J. S., & Griffin, M. (2015). The Moderating Role of Service Environment on
the Customer Share Customer Commitment Relationship New Meanings for Marketing in
a New Millennium (pp. 266-271): Springer, Cham.
Badri, M. A., Mohaidat, J., Ferrandino, V., & El Mourad, T. (2013). The social cognitive model
of job satisfaction among teachers: Testing and validation. International Journal of
Educational Research, 57, 12-24.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. California: Sage
Publications.
Casio, W. (2003). Responsible restructuring: Seeing employees as assets, not costs. Ivey
Business Journal Online, 1-5. Retrived: https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/
responsible-restructuring-seeing-employees-as-assets-not-costs/
Chamundeswari, S. (2013). Job satisfaction and performance of school teachers. International
Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 420-428.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation
analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Routledge.
Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and
perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support,
job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 269-280.
Demirdag, S. (2015). Assessing teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Middle school
teachers. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World (WJEIS), 5(3), 35-43.
Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Kunter, M., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2014). Self-efficacy in
classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion: A moderated
mediation analysis of teacher candidates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 569-585.
Duffy, R. D., & Lent, R. W. (2009). Test of a social cognitive model of work satisfaction in
teachers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 212-223.
Equitable Access to Excellent Educator Survey based on North Carollina’s Teacher
Working Condition 2014, Accessed July 19, 2017, Available: www.k12.wa.us/titleIIA/
EquitableAccess/AppendixB.pdf
Grant, A. M. (2014). Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–
coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? Coaching: An International
Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 18-38.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The Motivation to Work. Newbrusnwick:
Transaction Publishers.
Hosford, S., & O’Sullivan, S. (2016). A climate for self-efficacy: the relationship between school climate
and teacher efficacy for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(6), 604-621.
Hui, H., Jenatabadi, H. S., Ismail, B., Azina, N., Radzi, W. M., & Jasimah, C. W. (2014). Principal’s
leadership style and teacher job satisfaction: A case study in China. Institute of
Interdisciplinary Business Research 5(4),175-184
Hyvönen, K., Feldt, T., Salmela-Aro, K., Kinnunen, U., & Mäkikangas, A. (2009). Young managers’
drive to thrive: A personal work goal approach to burnout and work engagement. Journal
of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 183-196.
Jordan, G., MigliÄ, G., Todorović, I., & MariÄ, M. (2017). Psychological Empowerment, Job
Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment Among Lecturers in Higher Education:
Comparison of Six CEE Countries. Organizacija, 50(1), 17-32.
Karim, N., Khan, R. A., & Shamim, A. (2017). Determinants of Job Satisfaction in Schools
of Agha Khan Education Board, Karachi. Global Management Journal for Academic &
Corporate Studies, 7(1), 37-47.
Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2016). On the relationship between psychological empowerment,
trust, and Iranian EFL teachers’ job satisfaction: The case of secondary school teachers.
Journal of Career Assessment, 24(1), 112-129.
Koestner, R., Lekes, N., Powers, T. A., & Chicoine, E. (2002). Attaining personal goals: selfconcordance
plus implementation intentions equals success, Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 82(1): 231-234
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs
in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 12-35.
Liu, X. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of their jobs: A multilevel analysis of the
teacher follow-up survey for 1994-95. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 985-1003.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265-268.
Looney, S. W. (1995). How to use tests for univariate normality to assess multivariate
normality. The American Statistician, 49(1), 64-70.
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological
strengths. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57-72.
Moulding, L. R., Stewart, P. W., & Dunmeyer, M. L. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ sense of
efficacy: Relationship to academic ability, student teaching placement characteristics,
and mentor support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 60-66.
Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). The importance of autonomy
support and the mediating role of work motivation for wellâ€being: Testing selfdetermination
theory in a Chinese work organisation. International Journal of Psychology,
(4), 245-255.
Righetti, F., Kumashiro, M., & Campbell, S. B. (2014). Goal difficulty and openness to
interpersonal goal support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1107-1118.
RodrÃguez, S., Regueiro, B., Blas, R., Valle, A., Piñeiro, I., & Cerezo, R. (2014). Teacher selfefficacy
and its relationship with students’ affective and motivational variables in higher
education. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(2),107-120.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations
with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological
Reports, 114(1), 68-77.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal
structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 67(Oct-17), 152-160.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1993). Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in
special education referral. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 66-81.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multifaceted
construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 401-411.
Tang, S. w., Siu, O. l., & Cheung, F. (2014). A study of work–family enrichment among Chinese
employees: The mediating role between work support and job satisfaction. Applied
Psychology, 63(1), 130-150.
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover
intention, and turnover: path analyses based on metaâ€analytic findings. Personnel
Psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
Tickle, B. R., Chang, M., & Kim, S. (2011). Administrative support and its mediating effect on
US public school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 342-349.
Todorova, G., Bear, J. B., & Weingart, L. R. (2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task
conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 451-
Van den Berghe, L., Soenens, B., Aelterman, N., Cardon, G., Tallir, I. B., & Haerens, L. (2014).
Within-person profiles of teachers’ motivation to teach: Associations with need
satisfaction at work, need-supportive teaching, and burnout. Psychology of Sport and
Exercise, 15(4), 407-417.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures
of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Wayne, J. H., Casper, W. J., Matthews, R. A., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Family-supportive organization
perceptions and organizational commitment: The mediating role of work–family conflict
and enrichment and partner attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 606-624.
Wiese, B., & Freund, A. (2005). Goal progress makes one happy, or does it? Longitudinal
findings from the work domain. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
(2), 287-304.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Copyright of all the submissions to the Market Forces will remain to the contributors.
- Anyone is allowed to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon his/her work, even commercially, as long as it is credited/cited to the original contributors of the Market Forces.